Merkle Trees vs. Verkle Trees: Blockchain Data Structures
Discover key differences between Merkle and Verkle Trees and their impact on the efficiency and scalability of blockchain...
Discover key differences between Merkle and Verkle Trees and their impact on the efficiency and scalability of blockchain...
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
While we may be familiar with the concept of a blockchain as a digital ledger that records transactions through a network of computers, the intricate workings of this technology that powers decentralization are rarely well understood. One of the core embedded feature in blockchain architecture is Merkle trees, and it has been well covered by researchers over the last decade. Verkle trees are a more recent concept in the industry’s effort to make blockchain technology more scalable and efficient. But are they related to merkle trees? And how exactly does these “trees” play a role in distributed ledger technology? Well keep reading 🙂
Merkle trees, or hash trees, are a way to organize data using a tree-like structure where every piece of data is connected from bottom to top. At the bottom, each “leaf” node contains a hash (a kind of digital fingerprint) of a data block. As you move up the tree, each higher node holds a hash that combines those of its two children. This setup ensures that Merkle trees are balanced—each node has at most two children—and makes it efficient to check and verify data, as changing any piece of data would require changes all the way up the tree.
Building a Merkle tree starts by pairing off each piece of data at the bottom of the tree and computing a hash for each pair. These hashes then pair up and are hashed again, continuing this way up the tree. This process is repeated until there is just one hash left at the top, called the Merkle Root, or Root Hash. This top hash acts like a digital fingerprint for the entire set of data. By organizing the data in this way, Merkle trees make it quick and secure to check if any piece of the data has been changed, as any alteration would change the root hash.
SOURCE | Merkle Hash Tree
SOURCE | Verkle Trees
As the blockchain world continues to evolve, the need for more efficient and scalable data structures has become increasingly apparent. This is where Verkle trees come into the picture- a newer cryptographic data structure that promises to revolutionize the way blockchains handle and verify large amounts of data. Verkle trees are similar in structure to the well-known Merkle trees, which have been the backbone of the blockchain system since the inception of Bitcoin. Merkle and Verkle trees allow for the efficient verification of data integrity by organizing information into a tree-like structure and generating a cryptographic hash, or “root,” representing the entire dataset.
However, Verkle trees offer a significant improvement over their Merkle counterparts. The advantage lies in their ability to generate much smaller “witness” proofs, which are the cryptographic evidence required to verify the inclusion of a specific piece of data within the tree. Verkle trees utilize a more advanced cryptographic technique called “polynomial commitments” to potentially achieve a remarkable reduction in witness proof size. For that same billion-point dataset, a Verkle tree theoretically would require a witness proof of less than 150 bytes – a 20-30 times reduction compared to Merkle trees.
This dramatic decrease in proof size has profound implications for the scalability of blockchain networks. Smaller witness proofs mean less data needs to be transmitted and stored by network nodes, reducing the overall resource requirements and enabling the feasibility of “stateless” clients – nodes that can validate the blockchain’s state much faster without storing the entire state history.
Criteria | Merkle Trees | Verkle Trees |
---|---|---|
Cryptography | Simpler cryptography using hash functions | Advanced cryptography using Polynomial and Vector commitments |
Efficiency | Proof size grows with tree height, less scalable for large datasets | Compact proofs, less computational effort, scalability for high-throughput apps |
Complexity | Simple and easy to implement | More complex than Merkle Trees, manageable complexity |
Functionality | Efficient data verification through the hierarchical hashing structure | More efficient proof generation with compressed representation of node data |
Security | Highly secure using cryptographic hash functions, but security is compromised if the hash function is vulnerable | Enhanced security with vector commitments, yet also dependent on the integrity of the underlying cryptographic components |
Privacy | Offers limited privacy by requiring the disclosure of full branch paths for verification | Enhances privacy by enabling selective disclosure of only the necessary verification information |
SOURCE | Merkle Trees vs. Verkle Trees
The potential applications of Verkle Trees are vast and promising. With their compact proof sizes, enhanced security features, and scalability, Verkle Trees are poised to revolutionize various fields, including:
What is Node.Js | Cross Chain Bridge | Best Crypto Faucets | What is Intrinsic Value | Cores Vs Threads | Blockchain vs Cryptocurrency | Advantages Of Decentralization | Gui vs Cli | Hard Fork vs Soft Fork | What is a DAO | Public Key vs Private Key | Bitcoin Layer 2 | Blockchain Node | Truffle in Blockchain | Defi Wallet